RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01684
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Michigan to
Mississippi.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The address is no long valid, it is in error, and needs to be
updated.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant commenced her service in the Regular Air Force on
21 Aug 09 and served on active duty until 2 Jun 14, when she was
honorably discharged. According to both her AF Form 24,
Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF
Without Component, dated 3 Aug 09, and her DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, her HOR is
reflected as Monroe, MI.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation
(JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, states, The place
recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated,
reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded
when commission, appointed, enlisted, or inducted, or ordered
into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service
of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds
one full day, may the member change the HOR. The HOR is the
location identified by the individual upon entering the service,
not a location where the individual is later assigned or a
location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully
justified. Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR
will not.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPANF evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01684 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01684 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 April 2014.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF, dated 15 May 2014.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 August 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02279
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02279 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his home of record (HOR) as Othello, WA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03649
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with the JFTR, the applicant recorded her PLEAD as Galveston, TX and had no breaks in service; therefore her extended active duty order reflected her PLEAD as Galveston, TX when...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01244
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Grand Terrace, CA to Dededo, Guam. In Sep 07, he recorded his HOR as Redlands, CA on his Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force officer (AF24) with the intent to commission to attend HPSP. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individuals home...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02416
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no error or injustice that would justify a change in the applicants HOR. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03675
On 4 January 2005, the applicant was appointed to the Air Force Reserve via AF Form 24, Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF without Component, and recorded her HOR address as Boynton Beach-Palm Beach, FL. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01311
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01311 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect New Orleans, LA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02575
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02575 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive retroactive payment of Legacy Incentive Specialty Pay (ISP) for the period 2012 and 2013. After reviewing the applicants records and documentation submitted, they determined that the applicant submitted a single year ISP request 30 Oct 12 and her supervisor declined to certify her ISP contract. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00062
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Texas has been her legal permanent home state since 1964. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.